Even though old timers mutter about how pre-sales today aren't anything like the glory days .. for those of us in the indie sector it is still a vital part of film financing. So I thought I'd ask some experts for some answers on what we need to do to our projects to help pre-sales.
Showing posts with label Transmission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transmission. Show all posts
Presales - Learning from the Experts
Even though old timers mutter about how pre-sales today aren't anything like the glory days .. for those of us in the indie sector it is still a vital part of film financing. So I thought I'd ask some experts for some answers on what we need to do to our projects to help pre-sales.
Getting your indie film onto iTunes
Plenty of distributors talk about putting your independent film onto iTunes. They wax lyrical about how good they are at it, give estimated timelines .. talk about what deliverables you need .... but if you ask for a single example where they've successfully done it before then you just hear silence.
The reason why is fairly simple - Apple simply doesn't want to work with small distributors .. they want to work with large aggregators who provide a known quality of product. To be blunt - they can't be bothered working with independent films. But there are solutions.
The reason why is fairly simple - Apple simply doesn't want to work with small distributors .. they want to work with large aggregators who provide a known quality of product. To be blunt - they can't be bothered working with independent films. But there are solutions.
Labels:
box-office,
distribution,
Indie Film,
Short Film,
Transmission
Independent Film Finance Success Study - The King's Speech
If we want investors for our independent films then there is only question to consider: "What benefit will the investors get by putting money into this film?"
I've read plenty of indie film offer documents and prospectuses recently, and it's clear that they are doing their best to talk up the possibility of box office return.
But, sadly, we know that the reality for independent films is harsh. Really harsh. Even if the film gets international distribution and great box office returns we know most of that money won't filter back to the investors.
It is sobering to read the prospectus of a respected independent film fund only to find that 'You can be an extra!' and 'You get movie memorabilia!' are still being touted as serious benefits. And this is a film fund which, by definition, is only open to high net worth individuals
So I thought I'd look at some reasonably recent film funding decisions to see what I can learn. Why did investors put money into these independent films?
I'll start with a recent success story: "The King's Speech"
I've read plenty of indie film offer documents and prospectuses recently, and it's clear that they are doing their best to talk up the possibility of box office return.
But, sadly, we know that the reality for independent films is harsh. Really harsh. Even if the film gets international distribution and great box office returns we know most of that money won't filter back to the investors.
It is sobering to read the prospectus of a respected independent film fund only to find that 'You can be an extra!' and 'You get movie memorabilia!' are still being touted as serious benefits. And this is a film fund which, by definition, is only open to high net worth individuals
So I thought I'd look at some reasonably recent film funding decisions to see what I can learn. Why did investors put money into these independent films?
I'll start with a recent success story: "The King's Speech"
Labels:
Aegis,
Investment,
Molinare,
Prescience,
The King's Speech,
Transmission
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

